Here are a few Angel Kiss 159 Photos with Head LS56
She looks great. Hope to see more details on the options available from the manufacturer on her.
7 Likes
Yes she does look great. I’m a big fan of the 165 too.
Here´s the same in light tan. She is basically a WM159C that I slapped on a bit more weight both upstairs and downstairs. She was supposed to be a WM back in 2021 but suddenly surfaced as an AK a few months ago without my knowledge. The AK3-164 is the same but even more of everything.
6 Likes
Btw. the AK15 name is wrong on the first photos, AK15 is a different 159cm doll from a different team of people under the Angel Kiss umbrella.
That #LS56 face is stunning, I also kinda like her boots 
2 Likes
Wow this is great info @CUBiKO. So it seems the AK-4 is the true successor to the WM 159C, which is great to know for people who would like the WM159 TPE in silicone. The AK-15 seems to have a robuster sculpt that is not as close to the original WM 159. Great info! Appreciate it!
The AK15 in the first photos is in fact the AK4, the photos are mislabeled, someone at AK made a mistake. The AK15 is a completely different doll not related to any older WM models, it only shares the same height (159cm).
The factory did copy the WM159C into silicone but not sure if has been released yet. Meanwhile the AK4 is indeed a more robust version of the WM159C. The same with the AK3 which is av even more robust version of the older WM.
It´s complicated… 
How should us admirers and buyers know if even the manufacturer does not get things right. It’s a pity.
I made them aware of it and they did correct the photos and sent them out again, but most vendors did not bother updating to the new pics so they keep floating around.
The first post in this thread is from September though so that’s probably why they are mislabeled.
Here’s an updated one from the same shoot with the correct info. Kinda weird how the old WM #162 head turned out when copied to silicone. She ended up with constant bedroom eyes… I don’t dislike her that way 
5 Likes
Yeah it’s complicated. The naming conventions are not great. WM sent us their entire data set, several months ago, tens of thousands of photos, and it was a shit show. So this means we didn’t get the latest data. Ugh! 
As far as I know this is the only time they mislabeled a model so you should be good 